Primary question:Per your informative and thoughtful thread, https://www.openclinica.com/forums#/discussion/14914/am-i-missing-something-here
about " The same situation
exists with CRF status  - it has to be divined from the source code.", which table(s) has/have invalid data about CRF status or their status is not actually being used, instead the OC web portal uses another set of code?
I'm particularly interested in the event_crf table. Are the sdv_status data valid?
I could be wrong... but I don't really see the value of Double Data Entry for data integrity/data quality, its overhead may be a burden... rather I would beg to say that we might be better off to ensure data quality at the very first entry via validation etc. Or am I missing something for this industry?