We are currently working on the forum. For the short-term, all forum content will be in read-only format. We apologize for the interruption and look forward to collaborating with you shortly. All the best in your research!
SDV Requirement definitions
Hi all,
I'm trying to familiarize myself with the SDV function of openclinica as my company may be taking over responsibility for monitoring a study we're managing data for. One thing that's confusing me is when setting the SDV requirement for a CRF in an event "Partial Required" is an option. How does this differ from the 100% required, when the extent of what's captured by the SDV (that I can tell) is a check box, which by its nature seems either 100 or 0 %?
Brendan Yarmas,
System Manager
First Stop CBPD Corporation
Mobile: 301-917-7439
0
Comments
Very good question. I added some clarification of this to the SDV user
guide page (https://docs.openclinica.com/3.1/openclinica-user-guide/monitor-and-manage-data/source-data-verification),
as follows:
When you add CRFs as part of creating the Study Event Definition, you
specify if Source Data Verification is not applicable, not required,
partially required, or 100% required for the CRF.
What does 'partially required' mean? Often there are CRFs which
require 100% review, meaning every field on every CRF should be
reviewed (such as for Adverse Events). Other CRFs, however, may only
need to be partially reviewed. OpenClinica does not define what
"partial" means, but it would be defined in your monitoring plan and
you would instruct your team as to how to use this. Typically there
are two ways that "partial" is used in organizations:
An organization may identify several fields in a CRF which are
critical to the study. Monitors would be instructed to review only
these fields in a CRF (rather than the whole CRF) for all of the
subjects.
A monitor may review every field in the CRF but may only do this for a
percentage of the subjects (instead of all subjects).
Best,
Cal
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Brendan Yarmas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to familiarize myself with the SDV function of openclinica as my
> > company may be taking over responsibility for monitoring a study we're
> > managing data for. One thing that's confusing me is when setting the SDV
> > requirement for a CRF in an event "Partial Required" is an option. How does
> > this differ from the 100% required, when the extent of what's captured by
> > the SDV (that I can tell) is a check box, which by its nature seems either
> > 100 or 0 %?
> >
> > Brendan Yarmas,
> > System Manager
> > First Stop CBPD Corporation
> > Mobile: 301-917-7439
> >
> >
> >
>
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Users] SDV Requirement definitions
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> Very good question. I added some clarification of this to the SDV user
> guide page (https://docs.openclinica.com/3.1/openclinica-user-guide/monitor-and-manage-data/source-data-verification),
> as follows:
>
> When you add CRFs as part of creating the Study Event Definition, you
> specify if Source Data Verification is not applicable, not required,
> partially required, or 100% required for the CRF.
>
> What does 'partially required' mean? Often there are CRFs which
> require 100% review, meaning every field on every CRF should be
> reviewed (such as for Adverse Events). Other CRFs, however, may only
> need to be partially reviewed. OpenClinica does not define what
> "partial" means, but it would be defined in your monitoring plan and
> you would instruct your team as to how to use this. Typically there
> are two ways that "partial" is used in organizations:
>
> An organization may identify several fields in a CRF which are
> critical to the study. Monitors would be instructed to review only
> these fields in a CRF (rather than the whole CRF) for all of the
> subjects.
> A monitor may review every field in the CRF but may only do this for a
> percentage of the subjects (instead of all subjects).
MG>Another waltham based CRF provider in mobile space alluded to the same answer but I was unable to gather specifics
MG>since the ultimate goal is to pass clinical trials can we assume partial study information would not be presented to Investigator?
MG>or if presented to Investigator...there would be footnote specifying for internal use by physician, CRF Operational Director
MG>or another entity?
> Best,
> Cal
MG>Many Thanks for "thinking this through"
MG>Martin-
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Brendan Yarmas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to familiarize myself with the SDV function of openclinica as my
> > company may be taking over responsibility for monitoring a study we're
> > managing data for. One thing that's confusing me is when setting the SDV
> > requirement for a CRF in an event "Partial Required" is an option. How does
> > this differ from the 100% required, when the extent of what's captured by
> > the SDV (that I can tell) is a check box, which by its nature seems either
> > 100 or 0 %?
> >
> > Brendan Yarmas,
> > System Manager
> > First Stop CBPD Corporation
> > Mobile: 301-917-7439
> >
> >
> >
*** This message has been sent using QMobile A8 ***
Martin Gainty wrote:
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:39:16 -0500
>
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Users] SDV Requirement definitions
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> Very good question. I added some clarification of this to the SDV user
> guide page (https://docs.openclinica.com/3.1/openclinica-user-guide/monitor-and-manage-data/source-data-verification),
> as follows:
>
> When you add CRFs as part of creating the Study Event Definition, you
> specify if Source Data Verification is not applicable, not required,
> partially required, or 100% required for the CRF.
>
> What does 'partially required' mean? Often there are CRFs which
> require 100% review, meaning every field on every CRF should be
> reviewed (such as for Adverse Events). Other CRFs, however, may only
> need to be partially reviewed. OpenClinica does not define what
> "partial" means, but it would be defined in your monitoring plan and
> you would instruct your team as to how to use this. Typically there
> are two ways that "partial" is used in organizations:
>
> An organization may identify several fields in a CRF which are
> critical to the study. Monitors would be instructed to review only
> these fields in a CRF (rather than the whole CRF) for all of the
> subjects.
> A monitor may review every field in the CRF but may only do this for a
> percentage of the subjects (instead of all subjects).
MG>Another waltham based CRF provider in mobile space alluded to the same answer but I was unable to gather specifics
MG>since the ultimate goal is to pass clinical trials can we assume partial study information would not be presented to Investigator?
MG>or if presented to Investigator...there would be footnote specifying for internal use by physician, CRF Operational Director
MG>or another entity?
> Best,
> Cal
MG>Many Thanks for "thinking this through"
MG>Martin-
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Brendan Yarmas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm trying to familiarize myself with the SDV function of openclinica as my
> > company may be taking over responsibility for monitoring a study we're
> > managing data for. One thing that's confusing me is when setting the SDV
> > requirement for a CRF in an event "Partial Required" is an option. How does
> > this differ from the 100% required, when the extent of what's captured by
> > the SDV (that I can tell) is a check box, which by its nature seems either
> > 100 or 0 %?
> >
> > Brendan Yarmas,
> > System Manager
> > First Stop CBPD Corporation
> > Mobile: 301-917-7439
> >
> >
> >
Brendan Yarmas,
System Manager
First Stop CBPD Corporation
Mobile: 301-917-7439
-
I have no idea why I am included...
Dionysis Gardelis
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Brendan Yarmas
Sent: Τετάρτη, 8 Ιανουαρίου 2014 23:06
To: Cal Collins; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] SDV Requirement definitions
Thanks for the clarification Cal. Glad to see I wasn't missing some system
function behind the different settings. I checked the user guide for some
meaning for the predefined terms before I asked, I hope your update can
spare some other users my confusion.
Brendan Yarmas,
System Manager
First Stop CBPD Corporation
Mobile: 301-917-7439
-
*** This message has been sent using QMobile A8 ***
GARDELIS DIONYSIOS wrote:
Can anyone get me out of this loop please?
I have no idea why I am included...
Dionysis Gardelis
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Brendan Yarmas
Sent: Τετάρτη, 8 Ιανουαρίου 2014 23:06
To: Cal Collins; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] SDV Requirement definitions
Thanks for the clarification Cal. Glad to see I wasn't missing some system
function behind the different settings. I checked the user guide for some
meaning for the predefined terms before I asked, I hope your update can
spare some other users my confusion.
Brendan Yarmas,
System Manager
First Stop CBPD Corporation
Mobile: 301-917-7439
-
I have a idea for this if you don't mind share with you ?
Shaikh,
Manager health informatocs
*** This message has been sent using QMobile A8 ***
SHAIKH ASIF UDDIN wrote:
Yes I have
*** This message has been sent using QMobile A8 ***
GARDELIS DIONYSIOS wrote:
Can anyone get me out of this loop please?
I have no idea why I am included...
Dionysis Gardelis
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Brendan Yarmas
Sent: Τετάρτη, 8 Ιανουαρίου 2014 23:06
To: Cal Collins; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Users] SDV Requirement definitions
Thanks for the clarification Cal. Glad to see I wasn't missing some system
function behind the different settings. I checked the user guide for some
meaning for the predefined terms before I asked, I hope your update can
spare some other users my confusion.
Brendan Yarmas,
System Manager
First Stop CBPD Corporation
Mobile: 301-917-7439
-