Discrepancy notes: view within record

Comments

• tdpurnat Posts: 126 ✭

  January 2014

  Are the study set up parameters the same between the two studies?
  Are you using double data entry? The CRF is not editable until double data entry is completed.
  Or, with single data entry, the factor that comes to my mind is that the CRF has not been marked as "Complete". Workflow at that time assumes taht the data will still be changed by investigator before final save.
  Tina
  -------------
  Skype: tdpurnat | Office: +49 89 38 03 89 67 | Mobile: +49 151 29 17 99 64
  Why are my emails so terse? emailcharter.org [TED blog]
  2014-01-31 N. van der Meer :
  Dear all,
  
  We have defined two trials in OpenClinica and they behave differently with regard to the ‘view within record’ functionality when addressing discrepancy notes.
  
  1) In study A when one clicks ‘view within record’, both the discrepancy note and the associated CRF pop up. The CRF appears in the ‘enter data’ mode and is thus editable (the ‘save’ button appears)
  2) In study B when one clicks ‘view within record’, both the discrepancy note and the associated CRF pop up, but the CRF is not editable and appears in the ‘view’ mode
  
  Situation 1 is the preferred option; we would like to edit study B in such a way that it has the same functionality as study A when using ‘view within record’.
  But how do we do this?
  
  Thanks a lot,
  Nelly
  
  
  
  Met vriendelijke groeten,
  
  
  
  Nelly van der Meer, MSc
  
  
  Trialmanager/ Datamanager
  
  
  Clinical Trial Center
  
  
  Erasmus MC
  
  
  
  Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, intern postadres HS4-23
  
  
  Bezoekadres: s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, kamer HS4-20
  
  
  E [email protected] | T 010 704 19 94 | F 010 704 10 28
  
  
  www.erasmusmc.nl
  
  
  
  Aanwezig: Dinsdag t/m vrijdag

  0
• n.vandermeer Posts: 2

  January 2014

  Dear Tina,
  
  Thank you very much for your reply.
  The study set-up parameters are similar between both studies. We use single data entry. But indeed it has to do with the CRF status. When the CRF still bears the status ‘data entry started’, the ‘view within record’ functionality brings you to the CRF in ‘view’ mode (and is thus not editable). When the CRF is set to ‘complete’, both the discrepancy note and the CRF in editable mode pop up. Makes sense.
  
  Kind regards,
  Nelly
  
  
  
  
  Met vriendelijke groeten,
  
  
  
  Nelly van der Meer, MSc
  
  
  Trialmanager/ Datamanager
  
  
  Clinical Trial Center
  
  
  Erasmus MC
  
  
  
  Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, intern postadres HS4-23
  
  
  Bezoekadres: s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, kamer HS4-20
  
  
  E [email protected] | T 010 704 19 94 | F 010 704 10 28
  
  
  www.erasmusmc.nl
  
  
  
  Aanwezig: Dinsdag t/m vrijdag
  Sent: vrijdag 31 januari 2014 12:39
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [Users] Discrepancy notes: view within record
  
  Are the study set up parameters the same between the two studies?
  
  Are you using double data entry? The CRF is not editable until double data entry is completed.
  
  Or, with single data entry, the factor that comes to my mind is that the CRF has not been marked as "Complete". Workflow at that time assumes taht the data will still be changed by investigator before final save.
  
  Tina
  -------------
  Skype: tdpurnat | Office: +49 89 38 03 89 67 | Mobile: +49 151 29 17 99 64
  
  Why are my emails so terse? emailcharter.org [TED blog]
  
  
  2014-01-31 N. van der Meer :
  Dear all,
  
  We have defined two trials in OpenClinica and they behave differently with regard to the ‘view within record’ functionality when addressing discrepancy notes.
  
  1) In study A when one clicks ‘view within record’, both the discrepancy note and the associated CRF pop up. The CRF appears in the ‘enter data’ mode and is thus editable (the ‘save’ button appears)
  2) In study B when one clicks ‘view within record’, both the discrepancy note and the associated CRF pop up, but the CRF is not editable and appears in the ‘view’ mode
  
  Situation 1 is the preferred option; we would like to edit study B in such a way that it has the same functionality as study A when using ‘view within record’.
  But how do we do this?
  
  Thanks a lot,
  Nelly
  
  
  
  Met vriendelijke groeten,
  
  
  
  Nelly van der Meer, MSc
  
  
  Trialmanager/ Datamanager
  
  
  Clinical Trial Center
  
  
  Erasmus MC
  
  
  
  Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, intern postadres HS4-23
  
  
  Bezoekadres: s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, kamer HS4-20
  
  
  E [email protected] | T 010 704 19 94 | F 010 704 10 28
  
  
  www.erasmusmc.nl
  
  
  
  Aanwezig: Dinsdag t/m vrijdag

  0